Google fined by EUThe European Commission (EU) has slapped Google with a €4.34 billion fine for allegedly breaching EU antitrust rules, sparking off what is set to be a contracted period of appeals.

At its heart the fine revolves around the EU claiming that Google has imposed illegal restrictions on Android device manufacturers and mobile network operators in order to strengthen its dominant position in internet searches.

As you can imagine Google is not at all pleased by the ruling and its CEO Sundar Pichai was quick to respond via a blog:

Sundar Pichai, CEO, Google
Sundar Pichai, CEO, Google

…the European Commission issued a competition decision against Android, and its business model. The decision ignores the fact that Android phones compete with iOS phones, something that 89 percent of respondents to the Commission’s own market survey confirmed. It also misses just how much choice Android provides to thousands of phone makers and mobile network operators who build and sell Android devices; to millions of app developers around the world who have built their businesses with Android; and billions of consumers who can now afford and use cutting-edge Android smartphones.

Margrethe Vestager, European Commissioner for Competition
Margrethe Vestager, European Commissioner for Competition

If you jump to the other side of the fence EU Commissioner Margrethe Vestager, who is in charge of competition policy, had this to say as the EU confirmed the fine: “Today, mobile internet makes up more than half of global internet traffic. It has changed the lives of millions of Europeans. Our case is about three types of restrictions that Google has imposed on Android device manufacturers and network operators to ensure that traffic on Android devices goes to the Google search engine.

“In this way, Google has used Android as a vehicle to cement the dominance of its search engine. These practices have denied rivals the chance to innovate and compete on the merits. They have denied European consumers the benefits of effective competition in the important mobile sphere. This is illegal under EU antitrust rules.”

Pocket Change

The issue for Google is not the money, a relatively paltry sum in comparison to its financials, but more the issue of what happens if its appeals fail. As we have seen in the past, EU cases like this tend to last a while and are appealed and appealed and then eventually settled. Just ask Microsoft.

If you look at the history of this investigation, the EU’s interest in Google goes back to around 2009. In 2017 the EU fined Google €2.4 billion after claims it unfairly limited rivals of shopping comparison websites.

In his blog post Pichai lays out his logic about just how great things are due to Android: 24,000 devices from 1,300 brands, including many nationalities of manufacturers and 1m plus apps available from the Google Play Store. We must face the facts: Android is everywhere.

His last blog paragraph states: “Rapid innovation, wide choice, and falling prices are classic hallmarks of robust competition and Android has enabled all of them. Today’s decision rejects the business model that supports Android, which has created more choice for everyone, not less. We intend to appeal.”

So what next?

The EU has told Google that it is to: “stop its illegal conduct within 90 days of the Decision and refrain from any measure that has the same or an equivalent object or effect. In particular, the Decision orders Google to comply with the simple principle of giving equal treatment to rival comparison shopping services and its own service.”

On top of this should Google fail to comply, it would be liable for non-compliance payments of up to 5% of the average daily worldwide turnover of Alphabet, Google’s parent company. Oh, and for good measure, the EU also said that it had two more cases under way looking at the Android Operating System and AdSense – just in case anybody wasn’t thinking it was serious about its investigation of the company.

The ball is now firmly with Google who no doubt has a raft of very well-paid lawyers pouring over an appeal.

Consumer Response

Just a short browse around the web will deliver you a myriad of forums discussing the subject of the EU fine. As you can imagine the community at large is split between those who think the EU is overstepping its authority and those who see Google as controlling entity that needs putting in its place. They are not the first company to have this visited upon them [Microsoft anybody?] and certainly will not be the last.

Take a look at Pichai’s blog here, and if you want a treat follow his History link in the blog. If your eyesight survives, it is fun to see a map of the chaos we have lived with since 1974!

For those of you eager to read an EU press release try this.

So, what does it mean?

Years ago, Microsoft ran afoul of the EU and despite its appeals the company found itself making adaptations to its Windows operating system. Despite the machinations of Pichai this latest lawsuit feels like it is going the same way. Market dominance slapped on the wrist as if it is a bad thing with the EU laying the law down and demanding that changes take place.

Google looks set to push back, especially if Pichai’s blog is anything to go by, so we should all get comfortable, buy our popcorn in bulk and keep our eyes peeled for this lawsuit to get very eventful.

Previous articleCofense spots new HMRC tax scam
Next articleWhy you have to treat all your customers equally under GDPR
Cut him in half and the word technologist runs through Neil Fawcett’s core. Starting life as an engineer, specialising in the world of home computing, Neil the move to writing in 1985 and as the expression goes… never looked back. He was key to moving Computer Weekly away from its bias as a mainframe/minicomputer news title and propelled it into the exciting world of personal computing, breaking many an exclusive story. Following his tenure at CW he went on to work for various other publications, including participating in the UK launch of Information Week. During this time, he played a pivotal role in establishing custom publishing units designed to work alongside vendors to help define end-user publications and campaigns. Neil’s ability to take complex technology subjects and deliver digestible content frequently saw him appear on the likes of the national newspapers, the BBC and Sky, and often found himself delivering speeches to audiences around the world. With numerous books under his belt, Neil took time out in the new millennium to pursue a passion for toys/gaming and military history as he set up a manufacturing company with a global reach. He is now thrilled to have come full-circle and be back writing about his core passion: technology!



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here